Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Maroto v. CVS Corporation, et al
as 1:2020cv00537
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co. and CVS Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ellen Maroto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Tourigny v. Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company et al
as 1:2012cv10485
Plaintiff:
Ellen Tourigny
Defendant:
Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company and CVS Corporation Long Term Disability Income Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Zepp v. CVS Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv10031
Defendant:
CVS Corporation, Woodward Detroit CVS, L.L.C., George Mussall and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Zepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Beers v. CVS Corporation
as 1:2009cv01700
Plaintiff:
Lucille Beers
Defendant:
CVS Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Stuart v. CVS Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv14591
Plaintiff:
Sandra K Stuart
Defendant:
CVS Corporation and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Lightsey v. CVS Corporation Long Term Disability Income Insurance Plan et al
as 7:2008cv01323
Plaintiff:
Sue Lightsey
Defendant:
CVS Corporation Long Term Disability Income Insurance Plan and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DOROSHOW v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. et al
as 2:2008cv00259
Plaintiff:
JAY DOROSHOW
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. and CVS CORPORATION LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME INSURANCE PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
TRINKLE v. CVS CORPORATION
as 2:2007cv04879
Plaintiff:
JUDY A. TRINKLE
Defendant:
CVS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BRANTLEY v. CVS CORPORATION
as 3:2007cv00543
Plaintiff:
TY BRANTLEY
Defendant:
CVS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
