Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Sevag Chalian, et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc, et al
as 20-55916
Plaintiff / Appellee: SEVAG CHALIAN, SIGFREDO CABRERA, CHRISTINE MCNEELY, as individuals, on behalf of themselves, and all other persons similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: CVS PHARMACY, INC, a Rhode Island corporation, CVS RX SERVICES, INC, a New York corporation, GARFIELD BEACH CVS, LLC, a California limited liability company
Petitioner / Appellant: RYAN HYAMS, REGINE DUHON, Proposed Intervenors
Carole Lewallen v. Caremark LLC et al
as 8:2019cv02121
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy Inc, a Rhode Island Corporation, Caremark LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Carole Lewallen
Cause Of Action: Labor Litigation
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Shawna Cepeda v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv04500
Plaintiff: Shawna Cepeda
Petitioner: CVS Pharmacy, Inc., a Rhode Island corporation
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Garfield Beach CVS, LLC
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - Medical Malpractice
Kmart Corporation v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01506
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Plaintiff: In re: SUBPOENA UPON KMART CORPORATION,a non-party in an action pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, KMart Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sigfredo Cabrera, et al v. CVS RX Services, Inc., et al
as 19-15059
Defendant / Appellee: CVS RX SERVICES, INC., a New York corporation, CVS PHARMACY, INC., a Rhode Island corporation, GARFIELD BEACH CVS, LLC, a California limited liability company
Plaintiff / Appellant: SIGFREDO CABRERA, ENKO TELAHUN
Plaintiff: CHRISTINE MCNEELY, as individuals, on behalf of themselves and all other similar persons similarly situated
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re: In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Sigfredo Cabrera, et al v. CVS RX Services, Inc., et al
as 18-15459
Plaintiff - Appellee: SIGFREDO CABRERA, ENKO TELAHUN, CHRISTINE MCNEELY, as individuals, on behalf of themselves and all other similar persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: CVS RX SERVICES, INC., a New York corporation, CVS PHARMACY, INC., a Rhode Island corporation, GARFIELD BEACH CVS, LLC, a California limited liability company
United States of America et al v. Walgreen Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01293
Defendant: CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Company
Plaintiff: California, Jack Chin, Delaware and others
Intervenor: State Of California
213) 894-7819 (fax: U.S. DOJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: False Claims Act
United Food & Commercial Work., et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc, et al
as 17-80035
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant - Petitioner: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, TEIKOKU PHARMA USA, TEIKOKU SEIYAKU CO and others
United Food & Commercial Work, et al v. Actavis, Inc., et al
as 17-80034
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant - Petitioner: ACTAVIS, INC., ACTAVIS PLC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?