Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Landwer v. Cabral et al
as 1:2023cv03679
Plaintiff:
Charles H Landwer
Defendant:
Fatima Cabral, Kimberlin Hernandez and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Haywood v City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07036
Plaintiff:
Antonio Haywood
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Douglas Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06396
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv06711
Plaintiff:
Phillip Robinson
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Kevin Gomez, Andrius Tkachuk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. United States Of America
as 3:2021cv50097
Defendant:
United States Of America(FTCA), Cuauhtemoc Cabral, Traffic Control & Protection, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Rodriguez v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2019cv50282
Defendant:
Cuauhtemoc Cabral, United States of America, Magdalena Gazdowicz and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Cabral v. Cook County Dept of Corrections of Illinois
as 1:2019cv04662
Plaintiff:
Diandra A Cabral
Defendant:
Cook County Dept of Corrections of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Henderson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv00129
Defendant:
Michael Spaargaren, Alvin Jones, Robert Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceniceros et al v. Pactiv, LLC
as 1:2018cv01759
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Ceniceros and Jesus Cabral
Defendant:
Pactiv, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alvarado v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2017cv09363
Plaintiff:
Frank S. Alvarado
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, Thomas Dart, Sabrina Rivero-Canchola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
