Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Amaro v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv00973
Plaintiff:
Eric Amaro
Defendant:
J.R. Johnson, Robert Coupe, Neal Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALLOWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv06144
Petitioner:
SADIQ CALLOWAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CALLOWAY v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02552
Plaintiff:
RONALD CALLOWAY
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDING, INC. and DAIICHI SANKYO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Calloway et al
as 3:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Frances M. Calloway, Norma J. Campbell, Mary C. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CALLOWAY v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2014cv06980
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CALLOWAY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF BURLINGTON and CITY OF BURLINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01814
Plaintiff:
DENISE TATUM, BOBBY E. ABRAMS, JR., STEFON L. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
USA v. Sadiq Calloway
as 13-3421
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SADIQ CALLOWAY, a/k/a Omar Mullins a/k/a Marcus Arrington
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2707
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CALLOWAY v. BOURGHINI et al
as 2:2012cv01276
Plaintiff:
TORIAN CALLOWAY
Defendant:
DANTE BOURGHINI, DENNIS CHAKEY, MICHAEL LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CALLOWAY v. LUXURY FLEET SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv02463
Plaintiff:
RAYMONT CALLOWAY
Defendant:
LUXURY FLEET SERVICE, INC. and PATRICK DIBRE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
