Cases 81 - 90 of 92
Johnson v. Calloway et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
Cedrick D. Johnson
Defendant:
Butch Calloway, Stanford Westley and Danny Donovan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Calloway et al
as 6:2013cv01648
Plaintiff:
Clifton Lamar Jones
Defendant:
Richard Calloway and Lt Miller
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calloway v. Mason et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00311
Plaintiff:
Tyricka Lavon Calloway
Defendant:
Rene Mason, Jeremiah Thomas, Col. Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Calloway v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Tyricka Lavon Calloway
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Phyllis Billups, Kim J. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowling v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2011cv03534
Plaintiff:
Calloway Bowling
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Inc and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holt v. Burks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00722
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Holt, Jr.
Defendant:
W. Burks, Susan Clemmons and Lt. Calloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guzman et al v. Calloway Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01719
Plaintiff:
Francisco Guzman , Ulises Guzman , Roberto Cortes and others
Defendant:
Calloway Inc and John S Calloway, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McGlown v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2010cv02326
Plaintiff:
Hattie McGlown
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of, A. C. Roper and Anthony Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calloway v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2010cv00913
Plaintiff:
Henrietta Calloway
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
