Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Calvin Robinson v. Timothy Outlaw
as 15-60626
Petitioner - Appellant:
CALVIN LEE ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY OUTLAW, Wared, Marshall County Correctional Facility
Calvin Craddock v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 14-30737
Petitioner - Appellant:
CALVIN LEE CRADDOCK
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Robinson v. Outlaw et al
as 4:2013cv00059
Petitioner:
Calvin Lee Robinson
Respondent:
Timothy Outlaw and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Craddock v. Cain et al
as 2:2010cv02044
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Craddock
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
as 5:2009cv01509
Plaintiff:
George Calvin Lee
Defendant:
Warden Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill et al v. Recreation By Design, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv04556
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hill, III, Douglas Hill, III, Ba Le and others
Defendant:
Recreation By Design, LLC, Shaw Environmental, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Miller v. City of Yoakum Texas et al
as 6:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Miller
Defendant:
City of Yoakum Texas, Collin L Campbell, Keith Pikett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Redd v. Winn Correctional Center
as 3:2008cv01513
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Redd
Defendant:
Warden Winn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. Banks
as 08-60808
Petitioner - Appellant:
CALVIN LEE WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
JACQUELYN BANKS, Warden
Walker v. Banks
as 1:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Walker
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
