Cases 1 - 10 of 16
BRYANT v. CLARKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARMENT et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ROBERT-RICHARD BRYANT
Defendant:
CLARKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARMENT, CLARKE COUNTY JAIL, ALVIN S GLENN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15785
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ROBERTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
O'Neill v. IVERIC Bio Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Shannon O'Neill
Defendant:
Adrienne L. Graves, Mark S. Blumenkranz, Pravin U. Dugel and others
Coffman v. IVERIC bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
IVERIC bio, Inc., Adrienne L. Graves, Mark S. Blumenkranz and others
O'Dell v. Iveric Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04447
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Iveric Bio, Inc., Mark S. Blumenkranz, M.D., Axel Bolte and others
ROBERTS v. MCBRIER et al
as 3:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Calvin Roberts
Defendant:
JOHN MCBRIER and CHARLIE GRUBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. MCBRIER et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ROBERTS
Defendant:
JOHN MCBRIER and CHARLIE GRUBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61062
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv02562
Petitioner:
CALVIN ROBERTS
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alston v. Clark et al
as 8:2016cv01182
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Tabb Alston
Defendant:
Clark, Calvin Roberts, Jon W Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
