Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03360
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luis Calvo-Perez v. Todd Blanche
as 26-3062
Petitioner:
Luis Ronaldo Calvo-Perez
Respondent:
Todd Blanche, Attorney General of the United States
Calvo v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv26575
Plaintiff:
Yerandy Calvo
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
OMIDA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2026cv11662
Plaintiff:
LASHUNDA OMIDA
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, MICHELE CALVO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01562
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01561
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Matthew Barba et al v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2026cv13030
Plaintiff:
Matthew Barba and Renzo Calvo-Saez
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Calvo-Ruiz v. Blanche
as 26-2308
Petitioner:
BELLABETI CALVO-RUIZ
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
CALVO v DIRECTOR BECKY SCOTT et al
as 1:2026cv10314
Plaintiff:
GREGORY CALVO
Defendant:
DIRECTOR BECKY SCOTT, SGT. J. GONZALEZ, JR, OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvo v. Davis et al
as 2:2026cv02450
Defendant:
Anthony Thomas Davis and Rotork, Inc
Plaintiff:
Danery Antonio Abrante Calvo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
