Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 84
THC-Orange County, LLC v. Regence Blueshield of Idaho, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff: THC-Orange County, LLC doing business as Kindred Hospital-Ontario
Defendant: Regence Blueshield of Idaho, Inc., Cambia Health Solutions, Inc., Winco Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Type: Contract Insurance
THC-Orange County, LLC v. Regence Blueshield of Idaho, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: THC-ORANGE COUNTY, LLC d/b/a KINDRED HOSPITAL - ONTARIO and THC-Orange County, LLC doing business as Kindred Hospital-Ontario
Defendant: REGENCE BLUESHIELD OF IDAHO, INC., Cambia Health Solutions, Inc., Winco Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract - Insurance
Type: Contract Insurance
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff: JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Reyes v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff: Mishanta Reyes
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Cambia Health Solutions, Inc. et al v. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv00675
Plaintiff: Regence BlueShield, Regence BlueShield of Idaho, Inc., Cambia Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Defendant: Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Asuris Northwest Health et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2020cv04940
Plaintiff: Regence BlueCross and BlueShield of Utah, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, Regence BlueShield of Idaho, Inc. and others
Defendant: Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina et al v. Rite Aid Corp., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2020cv01731
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina (f/k/a North Carolina Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Inc.), Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah and others
Defendant: Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp, Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krishnan v. Cambia Health Solutions Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00574
Plaintiff: Sriram Krishnan
Defendant: Cambia Health Solutions Inc., Regence BCBS of Oregon and Cambia Health Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?