Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ardaneh v. US Government, et al
as 20-1887
Defendant / Appellee: CAMBRIDGE DISTRICT COURT, HEATHER STROUD, US JEWISH MAFIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HAMID REZA ARDANEH
Ardaneh v. U.S. Government et al
as 1:2020cv03450
Defendant: Evaluator Sara Laniado, Clerk of the Brockton District Court, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff: Hamid Reza Ardaneh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Li v. Belmont Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv10110
Plaintiff: Changgang Li
Defendant: Cambridge District Court and Belmont Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Li v. Belmont Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv00058
Plaintiff: Changgang Li
Defendant: Cambridge District Court and Belmont Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Li v. Warren Police et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00880
Plaintiff: Changgang Li
Defendant: Warren Police, Cambridge District Court and Belmont Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prall v. Cambridge District Court
as 1:2017cv11463
Petitioner: Tormu E. Prall
Respondent: Cambridge District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Prall v. Cambridge District Court We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv12915
Petitioner: Tormu E. Prall
Respondent: Cambridge District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States of America
as 13-292
Plaintiff - Appellant: Kevin Eric Smith
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America, Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense and others
Prall v. MA Supreme Judicial Court, et al
as 12-2092
Plaintiff - Appellant: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee: MA SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT, OFFICE OF THE BAR COUNSEL, CITY OF BOSTON, Law Department and others
In Re: Prall
as 12-1959
Petitioner: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: MA SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT, OFFICE OF THE BAR COUNSEL, CITY OF BOSTON, Law Department and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?