Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cameron Lawrence v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lawrence
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tang et al v. CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD., CITIC Limited, CITIC Capital Partners LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tang et al v. CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
John Yong Tang and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd., CITIC Limited, CITIC Capital Partners LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In the Matter of Cooper Marine & Timberlands Corporation
as 1:2020cv00191
Claimant:
The City of Columbus, Mississippi and Cameron Lawrence
Petitioner:
Cooper Marine & Timberlands Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30505
TAYLOR v. USA
as 1:2018cv00788
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CAMERON LAWRENCE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bancroft v. Garza et al
as 1:2017cv01444
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lawrence Bancroft
Defendant:
I. Garza, F. Briseno, E. Tindle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bancroft v. Garza et al
as 2:2017cv02067
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lawrence Bancroft
Defendant:
I. Garza, F. Briseno, E. Tindle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence, et al. v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC, et al.
as 1:2009cv01598
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lawrence and Marion Singer
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services LLC and Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lawrence v. Lawrence
as 1:2009at00725
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lawrence and Marion Lawrence
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
