Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Hale v. Camilia et al
as 2:2025cv02264
Plaintiff:
Rashagun Hale
Defendant:
Camilia .., Liz .. and Kristen ..
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Camilia et al
as 3:2025cv01832
Plaintiff:
Rashagun Hale
Defendant:
Camilia, Liz and Kristen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry et al v. Foreman et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Defendant:
Warden Shelbie Smith, Annette Chambers-Smith, R. Battles and others
Plaintiff:
Camilia T Terry and Unamed Plaintiff(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camilia TerryIn re: Camilia Terry
as 23-3487
Petitioner:
In re: CAMILIA TASHLIA TERRY
Respondent:
SHELBIE SMITH, Warden
Horvat v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00623
Plaintiff:
Kyle Evan Horvat
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Staton Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Campbell v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Campbell and Kyle Evan Horvat
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Staton Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell et al v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Campbell and Kyle Evan Horvat
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Alabama Department of Corrections, Staton Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Garnett et al
as 3:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Tom Lynch, Curtis Jones, Officer Strickler and others
Plaintiff:
Camilia T Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Mnuchin et al
as 3:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, Mr. Jones, Karen Bleise and others
Plaintiff:
Camilia T Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
