Cases 41 - 50 of 248
Wendt v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Larry Wendt
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Canadian Pacific Railway and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Touchette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Company
as 1:2016cv01000
Plaintiff:
Matthew Touchette
Defendant:
Canadian Pacific Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lechnir v. Canadian Pacific Railway
as 1:2016cv06994
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J Lechnir
Defendant:
Canadian Pacific Railway
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
KEACH et al v. CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2016mc00180
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J KEACH
Defendant:
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
Intervenor_plaintiff:
WHEELING & LAKE ERIE RAILWAY COMPANY
Debtor:
MONTREAL MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY LTD
Potter v. Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd et al
as 8:2016cv00499
Plaintiff:
Stefan Potter
Defendant:
Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd and Canadian Pacific Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
Whatley v. Canadian Pacific Railway Limited et al
as 1:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joe R. Whatley, Jr.
Defendant:
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited , Canadian Pacific Railway Company , Soo Line Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03948
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Canadian Pacific Railway Company
as 2:2016cv02067
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
Canadian Pacific Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702
Roy v. Canadian Pacific Railway Company, et al
as 1:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
REJEAN ROY
Defendant:
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
Movant:
ROBERT J KEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAMERON et al v. RAIL WORLD INC et al.
as 1:2016cv00125
Defendant:
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
Movant:
ROBERT J KEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
