Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith v. Andrew et al
as 1:2022cv01923
Plaintiff:
Candice Smith
Defendant:
Brian Michael Andrew and Georgia Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
Smith v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00871
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Candice Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv07624
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CANDICE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28902
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SMITH and CANDICE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv08354
Plaintiff:
CANDICE SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv08354
Plaintiff:
CANDICE SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC F/K/A LUZENAC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lucas et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00791
Plaintiff:
Amber Lucas , Sherita Antoine , James R. Bedford and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lucas et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv01339
Plaintiff:
Amber Lucas , Sherita Antoine , James R. Bedford and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Smith v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02164
Plaintiff:
Candice Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
