Cases 31 - 40 of 131
Evanston Insurance Company v. Rells Fire Protection Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rells Fire Protection Inc, Joseph Cannata and Oregon Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED/WRONG COUNTY
as 1:2017cv03114
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rells Fire Protection Inc, Joseph Cannata and Oregon Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOKES v. DEGREEF et al
as 1:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
WALTER STOKES
Defendant:
ALAN DEGREEF, WILLIAM BAILEY, BRYAN CANNATA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannata v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv04577
Plaintiff:
Rose M. Cannata
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CANNATA v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 3:2017cv03590
Plaintiff:
DAVID CANNATA
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01101
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cannata v. Confident Financial Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cannata
Defendant:
Confident Financial Solutions, Inc. and CFS Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
