Cases 31 - 40 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Feather-Gorbey v. Brown et al
as 5:2021cv00091
Defendant:
Case Manager, PA. #1, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Godbey and (Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saunders v. Frame et al
as 2:2021cv00157
Defendant:
Captain Toney, Ad Seq. Committee David McKenny, Investigator John Young and others
Plaintiff:
Quantel Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Adams, Warden et al
as 5:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Nurse L. Bird, Director Michael Carvajal, P. Adams, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Tonia L. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hartman v. Core Rover Officer et al
as 3:2020cv00226
Defendant:
Captain Pingley, Commissioner, Core Rover Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Claude Joesph Hartman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Babach et al
as 1:2020cv00273
Plaintiff:
James Arnold Brown
Defendant:
Captain Sams, L.R. Babach and Captain Leary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arbogast v. Jividen et al
as 5:2020cv00251
Defendant:
Jeremy Metz, C.O. Buzzart, Dan Kimble and others
Plaintiff:
John Arbogast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Arbogast et al
as 3:2020cv00722
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Correction and Rehabilitation, Captain Arbogast and West Virginia Division of Corrections
Plaintiff:
James M. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wale v. Hayhurst et al
as 2:2020cv00713
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Captain Brian Penick and Correctional Officer Dylan Hayhurst
Plaintiff:
Paul Wale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mason v. Santiago et al
as 2:2020cv00693
Defendant:
Captain Brian Penick, Correctional Officer Skylar Santiago, Correctional Officer Johnnie Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
