Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01613
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Roy Mitchell, Jr. v. David Mahoney, et al
as 18-1852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY A. MITCHELL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MAHONEY, M. ANHALT, Captain, JOE PARISI and others
Hoskins v. Foster et al
as 1:2018cv00574
Plaintiff:
Michael S Hoskins
Defendant:
Brian Foster , Sgt Beam, Sgt Burn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Carr v. Illinois State Police, et al
as 17-3647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS STATE POLICE, ERIC DAVID, Trooper (Badge #6329) in his individual and official capacity, V. TRAN, Captain, in his individual and official capacity and others
Woody et al v. City of Granite City, Illinois et al
as 3:2017cv00534
Plaintiff:
Ceara Woody , Michael Woody and Tempest Hornsley
Defendant:
Granite City, Illinois, Steve Willaredt, John Birdsong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2017cv00413
Plaintiff:
Marcus Carr
Defendant:
Illinois State Police, Eric David, Captain The-V. Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chad Stites v. David Mahoney, et al
as 16-1790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD ANDREW STITES
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MAHONEY, MICHAEL PLUMER, Dane County Sheriff Captain and JASMIN YUSUF-SAFAVI, Doctor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harrison v. Jaques et al
as 2:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Gary Joe Harrison
Defendant:
J Jaques , Captain Morris , Jeff Bang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
