Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Burton v. Crawford et al
as 4:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Dante Burton
Defendant:
C.O. Crawford, C.O. Cebrick, Unit Manager Grohowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
CARTER v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
RICHARD FITZGERALD, ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COGLEY v. COUNTY OF BUTLER, et al
as 2:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. COGLEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BUTLER, CITY OF BUTLER/CITY POLICE, R. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, NANCY GIANETTA, DEPUTY WARDEN EDWIN CRUZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Weaver et al
as 1:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Mark Clark
Defendant:
J. Weaver, Sgt. John Doe Smouse, Lt. John Doe Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLY v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv09696
Plaintiff:
TONI FLY and WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY
Defendant:
JAY FERGUSON, DANIEL L HOVCAND, M SEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILLER v. SOGO et al
as 2:2020cv04445
Defendant:
A. SOGO, SEAN MARLER, LIEUTENANT CASTILLO and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iverson v. Reese et al
as 4:2020cv01269
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Miller, John Doe, Captain John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
David Iverson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00425
Defendant:
Security Captain John Doe, Sgt. McCoy, Superintendent Ransom and others
Plaintiff:
William Victor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. LIBER et al
as 1:2020cv00327
Defendant:
MAINTENANCE C/O JOHN DOE SCHILLING, LIEUTENANT JANE DOE CRAWFORD, CAPTAIN JOHN DOE LIBER and others
Plaintiff:
BRUCE WAYNE JACKSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
