Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Planned Parenthood MN, ND, SD, et al v. Kristi Noem, et al
as 21-2922
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Sara A. Traxler, M.D. and Sarah A. Traxler, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Secretary of Health, Department of Health, in her official capacity, Kristi Noem, Governor, in her official capacity, Jason Ravnsborg, Attorney General, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Alpha Center and Black Hills Crisis Pregnancy Center, doing business as Care Net Pregnancy Resource Center
Planned Parenthood MN, ND, SD, et al v. Alpha Center, et al
as 21-2913
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Sara A. Traxler, M.D. and Sarah A. Traxler, M.D.
Defendant:
Kristi Noem, Governor, in her official capacity, Jason Ravnsborg, Attorney General, in his official capacity, Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Secretary of Health, Department of Health, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Alpha Center and Black Hills Crisis Pregnancy Center, doing business as Care Net Pregnancy Resource Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Educare Centre Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2020mc00010
Defendant:
Wissam Abedel Jilal, Mohammad Souheil, Mohammed Souheil and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Plaintiff:
Ohio, State of and Federal Trade Commission
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Educare Centre Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2020mc00006
Defendant:
Educare Centre Services, Inc., Mohammad Souheil, Prolink Vision, S.R.L. and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC and Robb Evans and Associates LLC
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio ex rel. Attorney General Dave Yost and Federal Trade Commission
PEARSON v. SUCCESSFUL AGING CARE NET INC.
as 2:2018cv04668
Defendant:
SUCCESSFUL AGING CARE NET INC.
Plaintiff:
STACEY PEARSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2011cv02082
Plaintiff:
CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF WINDHAM COUNTY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and THOMAS J. VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, et al v. Mike Rounds, et al
as 09-3362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and Carol E. Ball
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Rounds, Governor and Larry Long, Attorney General, in their official capacities
Intervenor Below - Appellee:
Alpha Center, Black Hills Crisis Pregnancy Center, doing business as Care Net, Dr. Glenn A. Ridder, M.D. and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant:
Family Research Council, Care Net, Heartbeat International, Incorporated and others
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, et al v. Mike Rounds, et al
as 09-3231
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and Carol E. Ball, M.D.
Defendant - Appellant:
Mike Rounds, Governor and Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General, in their official capacities
Intervenor Below:
Alpha Center, Black Hills Crisis Pregnancy Center, doing business as Care Net, Dr. Glenn A. Ridder, M.D. and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant:
Christian Medical & Dental Associations, American Association of Pro-life Obstetricians & Gynegologists, Catholic Medical Association and others
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, et al v. Alpha Center, et al
as 09-3233
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and Carol E. Ball, M.D.
Defendant:
Mike Rounds, Governor
Defendant - Appellant:
Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General, in their official capacities
Intervenor Below - Appellant:
Alpha Center, Black Hills Crisis Pregnancy Center, doing business as Care Net, Dr. Glenn A. Ridder, M.D. and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant:
Christian Medical & Dental Associations, American Association of Pro-life Obstetricians & Gynegologists, Catholic Medical Association and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
