Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BYRD et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv04977
Plaintiff:
ANGELA BYRD and CARL BYRD
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heflick v. Faulkner County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2011cv00614
Plaintiff:
Jason Heflick
Defendant:
Faulkner County Sheriff's Department, Carl Byrd, Bobby Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2010cv00771
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Dawson
Defendant:
Lumpkin, Carl Byrd, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Stewart et al
as 4:2010cv00534
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Dawson
Defendant:
Garry Stewart and Carl Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Stewart, et al
as 2:2010cv02073
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Dawson
Defendant:
Garry Stewart and Carl Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Stewart et al
as 4:2010cv00527
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Dawson
Defendant:
Gary Stewart, Carl Byrd, Mears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philmlee v. Byrd et al
as 4:2010cv00221
Plaintiff:
Travis Philmlee, Sr
Defendant:
Carl Byrd, Bobby Brown, John Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Philmlee v. Byrd et al
as 4:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Travis Philmlee, Sr
Defendant:
Carl Byrd, Bobby Brown, John Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANTON v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION (FORT DIX) et al
as 2:2009cv04313
Plaintiff:
RODNEY M. HANTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION (FORT DIX) and CARL BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRD v. NATIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85287
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CARL BYRD
Defendant:
NATIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRIES, INC., ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE, ALLIED EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
