Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Carpenter v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq02471
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Carl Carpenter
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Margaret Mitchell
Defendant:
Sheriff Nick Smith, T J Armstrong, Denzel Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv02977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Duane Carpenter v. United State
as 15-3580
Petitioner:
Duane Carl Carpenter
Respondent:
United States of America
Bowens et al v. Turner Guilford Knight Detention Center (T.G.K.) et al
as 1:2012cv20237
Plaintiff:
E-Yage Bowens, Mark Robert Walker, Dennis Gilman and others
Defendant:
Turner Guilford Knight Detention Center, Warden/Superintendent of T.G.K., Officers of T.G.K. and others
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Duane Carpenter v. United States
as 09-1114
Petitioner - Appellant:
Duane Carl Carpenter
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
King v. Dickerson et al
as 4:2008cv03668
Plaintiff:
Richard Ervin King
Defendant:
R.L. Dickerson, Carl Carpenter, Ricky Durham and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King v. Carpenter et al
as 4:2008cv01937
Plaintiff:
Richard Ervin King
Defendant:
Carl Carpenter and S Ross
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
