Cases 1 - 10 of 11
CHAPMAN SR v. SHAVERS et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
TREVON D CHAPMAN SR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN BRIAN SHAVERS, DEPUTY WARDEN SPANN, DEPUTY WARDEN OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Smith Transport PA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03075
Plaintiff:
Carl Parker
Defendant:
Smith Transport PA, Inc. doing business as Smith Transport, Inc. and Ellsworth Groce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Parker v. Smith Transport PA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03217
Plaintiff:
Carl Parker
Defendant:
Smith Transport PA, Inc. doing business as Smith Transport, Inc. and Ellsworth Groce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carl Parker, et al v. AGRI
as 19-5301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. C. Abrams, Lucious Abrams, Cecil Brewington and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture, Sonny Perdue, Secretary
United States of America v. Pac. Coast Plumb. Supply Assn et al
as 2:2019mc00084
Defendant:
F. A. Nitchey, A. H. Busch Co., A. R. Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
PARKER et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
as 1:2017cv02834
Plaintiff:
CARL PARKER, EDDIE SLAUGHTER, LUCIOUS ABRAMS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
PARKER v. USA
as 1:2016cv00264
Parker, et al v. TransCanada Energy USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00957
Defendant:
TransCanada Energy USA, Inc. and ANR Pipeline Company
Plaintiff:
Carl Parker, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vidrine et al v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
as 2:2008cv01765
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Vidrine, Britttany Vidrine, Rose Miller and others
Defendant:
Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
