Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Kennedy v. Haskins et al
as 7:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Kennedy
Defendant:
Petra Haskins, Sgt James and Capt Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Dept. of Corrections
as 7:2023cv00803
Petitioner:
Carl Ray Kennedy
Respondent:
Dept. Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2023cv00635
Petitioner:
Carl Ray Kennedy
Respondent:
Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RACKLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
CARL RAY RACKLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hamilton v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2023cv02918
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Hamilton
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Bruce Laird
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Vick v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Vick
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Day et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03251
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Day and Cheryl Day
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Carl McNeil, Jr.
as 22-4308
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARL RAY MCNEIL, JR.
Poore v. Unknown
as 7:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
Carl Ray Poole and Carl Ray Poore
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
