Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stephenson v. Davis
as 24-414
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STEPHENSON, (Class of One, Pro-se Petitioner)
Defendant:
CARLENE DAVIS, (D.O.C. Counselor Supervisor), ANGEL QUIROS, (Commissioner-Conn. Dept of Correction, BARONE, (Warden, MacDougall State Prison) and others
DAVIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv03755
Plaintiff:
CARLENE DAVIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stephenson
Defendant:
Carlene Davis, Angel Quiros, Kristine Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crispin v. Reischerl
as 21-883
Defendant / Appellee:
Shannon Dow, Keith Lizon, Gregorio Robles and others
Defendant:
Andrea Reischerl, A.P.R.N, Cheryl Cepelak, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jossean Crispin
Velasco v. Semple et al
as 3:2019cv00811
Defendant:
Moore, Rembish, Makay and others
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Velasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crispin v. Reischerl et al
as 3:2019cv00413
Defendant:
William J. Longo, Craig Purdy, Brian Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Jossean Crispin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv01881
Defendant:
Michael Bibens, Collen Gallagher, Omprakash Pellai and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKnight v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2018cv00708
Plaintiff:
Jamar McKnight
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez, Derrick Molden, Brian Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKnight v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv00696
Plaintiff:
Jamar McKnight
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Monica Rinaldi, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKnight v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv00456
Plaintiff:
Jamar McKnight
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Monica Rinaldi, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
