Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DANCE v. CARLISLE ETCETERA LLC
as 3:2023cv24637
Plaintiff:
Edith Dance
Defendant:
Carlisle etcetera, LLC and CARLISLE ETCETERA LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Carlisle v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al
as 3:2022cv06856
Plaintiff:
Teresa Carlisle, as an individual and on behalf of others similarly situated and Teresa Carlisle
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation, AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McCommon v. Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Robert McCommon
Defendant:
Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC and Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
McCommon v. Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC et al
as 2:2022at00427
Plaintiff:
Robert McCommon
Defendant:
Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC and Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Shawn Rhoades v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC
as 21-2381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN PHILLIP RHOADES, JOSEPH FRANKLIN DENNIS, JOSHUA MARSHALL FLOYD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC
Rhoades et al Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC
as 1:2021cv03391
Plaintiff:
Shawn Phillip Rhoades, Joseph Franklin Dennis, Joshua Marshall Floyd and others
Defendant:
Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DELP et al v. TRAIL KING INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00890
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DELP , JEFFREY ENT , KEVIN KAHLE and others
Defendant:
TRAIL KING INDUSTRIES, INC. and CARLISLE COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification (WARN)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
