Cases 11 - 20 of 33
BATTLE v. FORDHAM et al
as 1:2020cv00043
Defendant:
M. CASINO, MARSHALL PIKE, WANDA CARLISLE and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Settlemyer et al v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00344
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Kelsey-Hayes Company, Heavy Duty Parts, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Settlemyer and Jan Settlemyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CARLISLE v. PARKVIEW CHRISTIAN DAYCARE
as 1:2018cv00330
Defendant:
PARKVIEW CHRISTIAN DAYCARE
Plaintiff:
ALICE CAMERON CARLISLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Berryhill
as 7:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Justin Carlisle Graham
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hinrichs v. Sessions et al
as 5:2017hc02088
Petitioner:
Thomas Carlisle Hinrichs
Respondent:
Jeff Sessions and J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COMPTON v. WENDELTA, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01389
Plaintiff:
AMY G COMPTON
Defendant:
WENDELTA, INC. , WENDELTA PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, WENSTAR, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clary v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03268
Plaintiff:
Elijah Shane Clary
Defendant:
Frank Perry, George Solomon, David Guice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle Foodservice Products, Inc. et al v. Aladdin Temp-Rite LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00659
Defendant:
Aladdin Temp-Rite LLC and Nathan Jackson
Plaintiff:
Carlisle Foodservice Products, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ford v. USA
as 1:2016cv00255
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dewey Carlisle Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC. v. CARLISLE WIDE PLANK FLOORS, INC.
as 1:2014cv00933
Plaintiff:
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
Defendant:
CARLISLE WIDE PLANK FLOORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
