Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Rivera v. State Prison at SCI-Rockview et al
as 1:2013cv02329
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rivera
Defendant:
State Prison at SCI-Rockview, Prison Warden, State Commissioner of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. STATE PRISON AT SCI-ROCKVIEW et al
as 2:2013cv03024
Plaintiff:
CARLOS RIVERA
Defendant:
STATE PRISON AT SCI-ROCKVIEW, PRISON WARDEN, STATE COMMISSOINER OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera-Batista v. USA
as 3:2013cv01234
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jean Carlos Rivera-Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nunn v. Rivera
as 1:2013cv00015
Petitioner:
Tyrone Nunn, Sr
Respondent:
Carlos Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nunn v. Rivera
as 1:2012cv00610
Petitioner:
Tyrone Nunn, Sr
Respondent:
Carlos Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rivera v. Fischer
as 12-4917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Rivera
Defendant:
James Berbary, Superintendent, Collin Correctional Facility, K. Bellamy, Beuaway, Inmate Grievance Program Central Office Review Committee, DOCS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
M. Kinderman, Acting Superintendent, Marcy Correctional Facility
Migliaccio v. Rivera
as 1:2012cv00527
Petitioner:
Lance C. Migliaccio
Respondent:
Carlos Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harvey v. Rivera
as 1:2012cv00525
Petitioner:
Christopher Harvey
Respondent:
Carlos Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harvey v. Rivera
as 1:2012cv00510
Petitioner:
Christopher Harvey
Respondent:
Carlos Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nunn v. Rivera
as 1:2012cv00509
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Nunn
Defendant:
Carlos Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
