Cases 51 - 58 of 58
BROWN v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2008cv85208
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE E. BROWN, CLAUDE E. BROWN and CLAUDE E. BROWN
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO., ACANDS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BANKSTON v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2008cv85205
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. BANKSTON, WILLIAM M. BANKSTON and WILLIAM M. BANKSTON
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO., ACANDS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kelley v. Loudoun Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00428
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Kelley
Defendant:
Loudoun Auto Parts, Inc.
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Loudoun Auto Parts, Inc.
ThirdParty Defendant:
Jerry Currin, John Mangum, Currin Agency and Associates Insurance Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
ARMAMENT SYSTEMS V IQ HONG KONG
as 08-1291
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Armament Systems & Procedures, Inc.
Defendant:
Bandwagon Incorporated, Carquest Management Services, Inc., Emissive Energy Corp. and others
Carquest Management Services, Inc:
Emissive Energy Corp:
Defendant-Appellee:
Team Products International, Inc.
MECHIN v. CARQUEST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv05824
Plaintiff:
JEAN MICHAEL MECHIN
Defendant:
CARQUEST CORPORATION and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ARMAMENT SYSTEMS V IQ HONG KONG
as 08-1104
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Armament Systems & Procedures, Inc.
Defendant-Appellee:
Bandwagon Incorporated, C Crane Company, Inc., Carquest Management Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Carquest Corporation v. Carquest of Stafford, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00183
Plaintiff:
The Carquest Corporation
Defendant:
Carquest of Stafford, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
