Cases 71 - 80 of 105
JONES v. CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG et al
as 4:2014cv00099
Defendant:
BILL BRUNNER, DENNIS CARR, CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, DEARBORN COUNTY, STATE OF INDIANA, et al
as 4:2014cv00077
Defendant:
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY OF THE CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, DEARBORN COUNTY, STATE OF INDIANA, WILLIAM (BILL BILL) BRUNER, DONNIE BRYANT and others
Plaintiff:
DOUG TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARR v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
as 1:2014cv01041
Plaintiff:
MIKKI CARR
Defendant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Carr et al v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00769
Plaintiff:
Jim Carr and Rebecca Carr
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC , Biomet Manufacturing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 2:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
REED BERRY, BRIAN CARR, MARK CRENSHAW and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION TERRE HAUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carr v. Swan
as 2:2013cv00371
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Carr
Defendant:
Laura Kay Swan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. MITCHEFF et al
as 1:2013cv01298
Defendant:
DICK BROWN, MARLA GADBERRY, KIM GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID H. CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS et al v. MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION et al
as 4:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
ROSHANAK AMIRAZIZI, CHRISTIE BANKS, KATHERINE BOWLER and others
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re Disc Matter v Bruce Carr
as 2:2013mc00039
Respondent:
Bruce Carr
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
