Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Jones #190298 v. McWilliams et al
as 2:2015cv01848
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Carson McWilliams, Greg Fizer, J Silves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes #225899 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv02178
Plaintiff:
Antonio L Hughes
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Carson McWilliams and Ronald Towels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2012cv00313
Plaintiff:
Saundra L Cunningham
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Arizona Department of Corrections , Carson McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Welch v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv02164
Plaintiff:
Jeff Michael Welch
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, K Klausner, Carson McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Cruz v. McWilliams et al
as 2:2011cv01703
Petitioner:
Juan Francisco De La Cruz
Respondent:
Carson McWilliams and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
West et al v. Brewer et al
as 2:2011cv01409
Plaintiff:
Thomas Paul West, Gregory Dickens, Charles M Hedlund and others
Defendant:
Janice K Brewer, Charles L Ryan, Ernest Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bertanelli v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01340
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Carson McWilliams, Gregory Fizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaty v. Brewer, et al
as 2:2011cv01037
Plaintiff:
Donald Beaty
Defendant:
Janice K Brewer , Charles L Ryan , Ernest Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Brewer et al
as 2:2011cv00557
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Cook
Defendant:
Janice K Brewer, Charles L Ryan, Ernest Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Brewer et al
as 2:2010cv02454
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Cook
Defendant:
Janice K Brewer , Charles L Ryan, Ernest Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
