Cases 51 - 60 of 417
Thomas v. Forrest City Correctional Complex Medium et al
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas
Defendant:
Forrest City Correctional Complex Medium, John Yates, Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balentine et al v. Carter et al
as 3:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jamall Balentine
Defendant:
Nicci Carter, Audrey Huddleston and Nini Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balentine et al v. Carter et al
as 5:2021cv05229
Plaintiff:
Jamall Balentine
Defendant:
Nurse Audrey Huddleston, Nicci Carter and Nini Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Askew v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Jail et al
as 4:2021cv01159
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michaels Askew
Defendant:
Pulaski County Regional Detention Jail, Little Rock Police Department, Brace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2021cv01152
Plaintiff:
Shaun C Allen
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Conway, City of, Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Baptist Medcare Inc et al
as 4:2021cv01092
Plaintiff:
Nokomis Carter
Defendant:
Baptist Medcare Inc doing business as Practice Plus, Baptist Health, Teri Berg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woodson v. Gladden et al
as 3:2021cv00224
Plaintiff:
Ray Anthony Woodson, Sr
Defendant:
Gladden, Petty, Audrey Luff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. Cook et al
as 3:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
Ray A Woodson
Defendant:
Dale Cook, Charles McCollum, Audrey Luff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Does
as 3:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
Rubby James Gray
Defendant:
Does, Patricia Marshall, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Swopes et al
as 2:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
Brent T Martin, Sr
Defendant:
Adam Swopes, Phillips County Detention Center and Jason Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
