Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02605
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Douglas et al v. City of Oakland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02820
Plaintiff: Giovante Douglas and Cartier Hunter
Defendant: City of Oakland and Phong Tran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph v. Damico et al
as 9:2023cv80253
Plaintiff: Eshanti Lanae Joseph
Defendant: Paul Damico, Kirk Volker, August Bonavita and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04672
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv21697
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02339
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Edwin Novel et al v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2019cv01922
Plaintiff: Jewelry by Novel, Novel Fine Jewelry and Edwin Novel
Defendant: Richemont North America, Inc., Deputy MARTIN VILLA, Deputy Michael Galvan and others
Interested Party: KH Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00095
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00622
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown v. Cartier et al
as 1:2013cv00246
Defendant: Art Acevedo and James Cartier
Plaintiff: Nathanael Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?