Cases 1 - 10 of 485
Holloway v. Korecz et al.
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Case Holloway
Defendant:
Police Officer Korecz, Police Officer Young, Police Officer Chesser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Case v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01690
Plaintiff:
Michael Case
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Johnson v. Brian Barney, et al
as 24-3287
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN BARNEY, JASON JOSEPH, WILLIAM COOL and others
Todd Bonds v. Berne Union Local Schools, et al
as 24-3283
Plaintiff:
TODD BONDS
Defendant:
DANIEL SNIVLEY, Athletic Director, Individually, LEAH ARMSTRONG, Case Worker, Individually and BERNE UNION LOCAL SCHOOLS
Arnold v. Hauswirth et al.
as 4:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Ralph Arnold
Defendant:
Kyle A. Hauswirth, Karrie Hupka, Unit Manager Joe Remish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmy Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-5099
Plaintiff:
TIMMY WALLACE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HECTOR JOYNER, Warden, USP Big Sandy, R. MILLER, Correctional Officer, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy and others
Kennedy v. ACT for Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Renee Kennedy
Defendant:
ACT for Health, Inc. d/b/a Professional Case Management, Richard L Wittenberg, ACT for Health, Inc. doing business as Professional Case Management and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lawson v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03985
Defendant:
Lt. David Sandridge, Aramark Correctional Services LLC, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
