Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Michaelson v. Clean Cut Lawn Care, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Collin Michaelson
Defendant:
Clean Cut Lawn Care, LLC and Andrew Case
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gaylord, et al. v. Ada County, et al.
as 1:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Garth Gilbert Gaylord, Lori Marr, Paul Smith and others
Defendant:
Ada County, Judiciary Courts of the State of Idaho, Michael Macleod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sileoni v. Warden Richardson et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Warden Richardson, Warden Ramirez, Warden Mckay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Case v. USA
as 1:2022cv00131
Petitioner:
Brooks Allan Case
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sahara Case, LLC v. Belair Electronics, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Sahara Case, LLC
Defendant:
Belair Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Sahara Case, LLC v. Belair Electronics, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Sahara Case, LLC
Defendant:
Belair Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Nelson v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2019cv00250
Defendant:
R Winter, Campbell, Randy Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Joseph Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala et al v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2019cv00107
Defendant:
R Winter, Campbell, Randy Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus George Ayala and Gregory Joseph Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molina et al v. Ada County et al
as 1:2018cv00352
Defendant:
Ada County, Amanda Case, Karen Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Fidel Molina and Christy Loveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
Kerry Case
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
