Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Caraballo v. Bristol County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv10324
Plaintiff:
Raymond Caraballo
Defendant:
Bristol County Sheriff's Office, Thomas Hodgson, Intake and Classification Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nieves-Dominguez v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 20-1552
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN RIVERA-QUINONES, Correctional Officer #13040, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, MARIA DE LEON-APONTE, Classification Supervisor and others
Defendant:
ORLANDO TORRES-COCHRAN, Superintendent of Institution, PAULA M. ORTIZ, Examiner Official for Disciplinary Hearing and EINAR RAMOS-GONZALEZ, Secretary, Department of Correction & Rehabilitation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HERIBERTO NIEVES-DOMINGUEZ
Gamache v. Magnusson, et al
as 11-2338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD ADAM GAMACHE
Defendant:
JEFFREY MERRILL, SCOTT MCAFFERY, DOE, SARGEANTS, all Sargeants involved in A-Close "Protective Custody" and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN MAGNUSSON, both in his individual and official capacity as Commissioner of Corrections, State of Maine Correctional System, CHARLIE CHARLTON, both in her individual and official capacity as Case Worker and Correctional Unit Manager of the Close Custody Unit, Maine State Prison, DOUGLAS STARBIRD, both in his individual capacity as Correctional Unit Manager of the Special Management Unit, Maine State Prison and others
Davis v. Bristol County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2010cv11250
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Bristol County Sheriff's Department, Grievance Coordinator, Robert Hochu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bromley v. State of UT, et al
as 09-1351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN L. BROMLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF UT, MARK SHURTLEFF, Utah Attorney General, BEN STONEMAN, Utah Assistant Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
