Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Monroe et al v. Suns Legacy Partners LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Martese Monroe and Cass Monroe
Defendant:
Suns Legacy Partners LLC, Phoenix Mercury Basketball LLC and Phoenix Area Development LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sharon Cass v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2022cv01434
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cass
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Janet Arviso, Beaudrea Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Miera et al v. CASS et al
as 2:2021cv01720
Plaintiff:
Andy Julius Miera, Jr., Unknown Party and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
CASS, Andre's House, Red Roof Inns Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv07869
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Federico Rosas v. T. Streeter ID No 5733 et al
as 8:2014cv01061
Defendant:
Cass ID No 2190, Cass ID No 2190, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Federico Rosas
Sellers v. Reynolds et al
as 2:2013cv01865
Plaintiff:
Jay L. Sellers
Defendant:
Craig Reynolds, Cass Sylvia, Lois Wolk and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Sherrie Sandau v. John Wood, et al
as 11-35405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERRIE CARLSON SANDAU
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. WOOD, in his individual capacity as a police officer for the Portland Police Bureau, CHRISTOPHER CASS, in his individual capacity as a police officer for the Portland Police Bureau and CITY OF PORTLAND
Conish et al v. Cass et al
as 2:2008cv01078
Plaintiff:
Travis Dwayne Conish and IVM Inspired Vision Ministries
Defendant:
Cass and Staff Member
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sandau v. Wood et al
as 3:2007cv00632
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Carlson Sandau and Sherrie Carlson Sandau
Defendant:
John A. Wood, Christopher Cass and City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
