Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cathy Woods v. Donald Ashley, et al
as 20-16828
Defendant / Appellant:
CLARENCE A. LEWIS, "Jackie" and DONALD W. ASHLEY
Defendant:
LAWRENCE C. DENNISON and CITY OF RENO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CATHY WOODS, by and through her Personal Representative Linda Wade, AKA Anita Carter
Cathy Woods v. City of Reno, et al
as 20-16827
Defendant / Appellant:
LAWRENCE C. DENNISON and CITY OF RENO
Defendant:
DONALD W. ASHLEY and CLARENCE A. LEWIS, "Jackie"
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CATHY WOODS, by and through her Personal Representative Linda Wade, AKA Anita Carter
A.G. v. Everett School District et al
as 2:2017cv01409
Plaintiff:
A.G.
Defendant:
Everett School District , Cathy Woods , James Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods vs City of Reno, et al
as 3:2016cv00494
Plaintiff:
Woods, Cathy Woods and Anita Carter
Defendant:
City of Reno, Clarence A. "Jackie Lewis, Lawrence C. Dennison and others
Petitioner:
Oregon Department of Corrections and Recordkeeper Nickie Basinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
Cathy Wood
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. , John Does 1-5, Jane Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woods v. NorthWestern Energy
as 2:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
Cathy Woods
Defendant:
NorthWestern Energy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cathy Wood et al v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2015cv00697
Defendant:
Does and General Motors LLC
Plaintiff:
Cathy Wood and Cathy Wood
Leal v. Cohn et al
as 2:2014cv01762
Plaintiff:
Michael Leal
Defendant:
Gary Cohn , Cathy Woods , Laura Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zachary Barker Coughlin v. City of Reno, ex rel., et al
as 3:2013cv00446
Defendant:
Thomas Alaksa, Robbin Baker, Larry Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Barker Coughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
