Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Greene v. Justice et al
as 5:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Randolph County, Jim Justice, Betsy C. Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Feaster et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Greene
Defendant:
Sidney Feaster, Governor Jim Justice, Randolph County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Greene v. Marvin Plumley
as 19-7286
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH M. WINGFIELD, Correctional Officer; Sgt., TIMMY CUTRIGHT, Correctional Officer 2, CECIL PRITT, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Greene v. Plumley et al
as 3:2019cv00102
Defendant:
Kenneth Wingfield, Andrew Hinchman, Timmy Cutright and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Jividen et al
as 1:2019cv00100
Respondent:
Joe Shiflett, Keefe, Amanda Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Timberlake Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Farmer et al
as 3:2018cv01355
Defendant:
Unit Manager Cecil Pritt, Administrator King, C.O. Adkins and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Timberlake Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Plumley et al
as 3:2018cv00108
Defendant:
Sergeant Justin Close, Richard Gisell, Sergeant Kenneth Wingfield and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Shiflett et al
as 3:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Greene
Defendant:
Shannon Shiflett, N. Summerfield, A. Arbogast and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moats v. Plumley et al
as 3:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jessee Lee Moats
Defendant:
Marvin C. Plumley, Gary Arbogast, Laura Elbon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. West Virginia Division Of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Peter Anderson
Defendant:
West Virginia Division Of Corrections, Dustin Cassel, Doug White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
