Cases 81 - 90 of 142
BANKS v. DISNEY et al
as 2:2016mc00650
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DISNEY, DISNEY RESPORTS, ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
HETZNECKER v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY et al
as 2:2016cv00945
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. HETZNECKER
Defendant:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY , CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BANKS v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2016mc00079
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
MARK HORNAK, ORLANDO HARPER, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. RAIBIL et al
as 2:2016mc00080
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
RAIBIL, KRISTIN VACSULKA, RICH FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. STEELE et al
as 2:2016cv00589
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
KEVIN STEELE, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE MONTGOMERY COUNTY, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. District Attorneys Office et al
as 1:2016cv00081
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
District Attorneys Office, Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Warden, County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. WIETZMAN et al
as 2:2016mc00058
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
MARK G. WIETZMAN, DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE and others
TESTA v. HOBAN et al
as 3:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Defendant:
JACK HOBAN, JOSEPH ACHACOSO, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. TRUMP et al
as 2:2015mc00936
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
SCHLEMMER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2015cv01583
Petitioner:
LAUREL MICHELE SCHLEMMER
Respondent:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ORLANDO HARPER, KATHLEEN KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
