Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Broderick v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Scott Broderick
Defendant:
United States of America, Central Intelligence Agency, William Burns and others
Ainsley v. United States Air Force, et al
as 1:2021cv01795
Plaintiff:
Absynth Ainsley
Defendant:
United States Air Force, NASA, Targeted Individual Program and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Silva v. U.S. Army et al
as 4:2021cv00275
Defendant:
Perrigo Company Inc., NorthstarRX LLC Pharmaceuticals, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Clayton Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcu v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 0:2021cv60595
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff:
George Cornell Marcu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barth v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 6:2020cv02195
Defendant:
Jersey City Medical Center, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Missoula Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Glenn Barth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
WEINSCHENK v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2020cv02510
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RYAN WEINSCHENK
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zeiny v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv05806
Plaintiff:
Al Zeiny
Defendant:
United States of America and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McIntosh-Jennings v. Graham
as 4:2019cv04313
Plaintiff:
Kaleb McIntosh-Jennings
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington State Fusion Center, Aubry Drake Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Loudenslager v. US Central Intelligence Agency
as 1:2018cv01062
Defendant:
US Central Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff:
Bruce Loudenslager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Durlin v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 2:2018cv02709
Plaintiff:
Cody J. Durlin
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
