Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 330
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. FRW19006 v. George Chopp d/b/a Freehand Concepts, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv03448
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. FRW19006
Defendant: George Chopp d/b/a Freehand Concepts, Inc. and Bomasada Investment Group, II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Morrow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00180
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Defendant: Eugene C. Morrow , Horizon Transport, Inc., Klaus Bermel-Schanz and others
Cross_claimant: Scottsdale Indemnity Company
Cross_defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company , Alfa Mutual Insurance Company , Eugene C. Morrow and others
Counter_claimant: Scottsdale Indemnity Company
Counter_defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
Wieck v. CIT Group, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00596
Plaintiff: Julia Wieck
Defendant: CIT Group, Inc., CIT Bank, N.A., Financial Freedom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al., v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016mc02778
ThirdParty Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
ThirdParty Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Resolute Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Eastwood Townhomes Association, Inc., The v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Subscribing to Certificate No. LHPQ-71286-70
as 1:2016cv02686
Plaintiff: Eastwood Townhomes Association, Inc., The
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Subscribing to Certificate No. LHPQ-71286-70
Counter_claimant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Subscribing to Certificate No. LHPQ-71286-70
Counter_defendant: Eastwood Townhomes Association, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Type: Contract Insurance
Commerce Capital Partners, LLC et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al
as 4:2016cv03192
Plaintiff: Commerce Capital Partners, LLC , ComCapp Cornerstone, LLC , ComCapp Woodcreek, LLC and others
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London , USI Insurance Services, LLC , VeriClaim, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Martinez et al v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London
as 7:2016cv00621
Plaintiff: Pete Martinez and Gladys Trevino
Defendant: Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London and Luis F. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Thomas v. National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00724
Plaintiff: John W. Thomas
Defendant: National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc., National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. Loss of License Plan, Petersen International Underwriters Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London v. Neal
as 1:2016cv00559
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London
Defendant: Charles C. Neal , Molokini Divers, Inc. and Nealco International, LLC
Counter_claimant: Nealco International, LLC , Charles C. Neal and Molokini Divers, Inc.
Counter_defendant: Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Crestmark Bank v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv13670
Plaintiff: Crestmark Bank
Defendant: AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy Number FINFRI1501777
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?