Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Brown et al v. Challenge Mfg. Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Dawan Brown, Joshua Ryan Humphrey and Frederick Cranford
Defendant:
Challenge Mfg. Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Glenn v. Challenge Mfg. Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Glenn Matthew and Matthew Glenn
Defendant:
Challenge Mfg. Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act
Pratt v. Challenge Mfg. Company
as 2:2022cv10361
Plaintiff:
John Pratt
Defendant:
Challenge Mfg. Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Pratt v. Challenge MFG Company
as 2:2022cv10362
Plaintiff:
John Pratt
Defendant:
Challenge MFG Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Challenge Mfg. Company, LLC v. Hartford Finishing, LLC
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Challenge Mfg. Company, LLC
Defendant:
Hartford Finishing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Challenge Mfg. Company, LLC v. Shamrock International Fastener LLC
as 1:2021cv00726
Plaintiff:
Challenge Mfg. and Challenge Mfg. Company, LLC
Defendant:
Shamrock Industrial Fastener Corporation and Shamrock International Fastener LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv06005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
