Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Clark v. Weiser et al
as 1:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
Philip J. Weiser, India Kidd-Aaron, Patty Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chan (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Christina Apostoli and Kelly Lafave
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan-Barbosa v. Garland
as 24-9510
Petitioner:
ABNER NATANAEL CHAN-BARBOSA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Chan (PS) v. Chai Mai Roon, et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
No Named Respondents, Chan Mai Roon, Htaw Rot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark (PS) v. Weiser et al
as 1:2023cv03187
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
Philip J. Weiser, CO AG Office, India Kidd Aaron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chan (PS) v. Latore, et al
as 1:2023cv02894
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
No Named Respondent, Kelly Latore, Kaire Colwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clark v. Weiser et al
as 1:2023cv03283
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
Philip J. Weiser, India Kidd-Aaron, Robert Finke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chan (PS) v. Roon
as 1:2023cv02498
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Attorney General State of Colorado, Chan Moi Roon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan (PS) v. Tatoya et al
as 1:2023cv02314
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
Mo Tatoya, Michael Dugo, Punjwanj and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
