Cases 11 - 20 of 128
Workman v. Chandler et al
as 0:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Albert Easley Workman, Jr.
Defendant:
Larry Chandler, Patrick Snyder, Trent Fannin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mekus v. Adams et al
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mekus
Defendant:
Mike Adams, Albert B. Chandler, III, Sherry Whitehouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Baker v. Chandler et al
as 4:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Ashley Heath A Baker
Defendant:
Larry D. Chandler, Cookie Crews, Rhonda May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gibson, Willard Sowards, Judy Sowards and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC, American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Chenault v. Fayette County Detention Center et al
as 5:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Chenault
Defendant:
Fayette County Detention Center and Nicholas A. Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnette v. USA
as 6:2022cv00032
Petitioner:
Chandler Burnette
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Boulder v. Chandler
as 5:2021cv00314
Petitioner:
John George Boulder
Respondent:
Warden Larry Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Chandler et al
as 5:2021cv00275
Plaintiff:
Eric Dawayne Jackson, E-Fat and Fats
Defendant:
Alexis Chandler and Corizon Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIntosh v. Crews et al
as 5:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
Carlton E. McIntosh, Sr.
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Larry Chandler, Dannel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Chandler and Frank E. Chandler
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc. and Ronald W. Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
