Cases 1 - 10 of 46
MACLIN et al v. RILEY et al
as 1:2023cv01776
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MACLIN and VICKIE DRIVER
Defendant:
LUCAS RILEY, ALEXANDER GREGORY, CARL CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHANDLER v. WILLIS et al
as 1:2023cv01710
Plaintiff:
KEITH CHANDLER
Defendant:
G. WILLIS, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
GRIFFIN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01666
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL GRIFFIN
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLES HOUCHINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURDAUGH-CHANDLER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
MELISSA MURDAUGH-CHANDLER
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHANDLER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. CHANDLER
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
CAMERSON J. THOMPSON and CAMERON J. THOMPSON
Defendant:
DAVE WEDDING, COWLING, CULVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv02517
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BAILEY, JR.
Defendant:
R. YOUNG, CHANDLER and PIKE TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BAILEY, JR.
Defendant:
R. YOUNG, CHANDLER and PIKE TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
