Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MCCLOSKEY v. AMMERMAN et al
as 3:2021cv00164
Petitioner:
CHANDLER DALE MCCLOSKEY
Respondent:
FREDRIC J. AMMERMAN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CLEARFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CHANDLER v. SHARON PD et al
as 2:2020cv00026
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY and SHARON PD
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCEY D. CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
EYAJAN v. UPMC FOR YOU et al
as 1:2019cv00280
Defendant:
UPMC HAMOT HOSPITAL, DR. CHANDLER CHRISTINE, UPMC EAST HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA M. EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS V. UPMC
as 2:2019cv00865
Defendant:
UPMC MAGEE HOSPITAL/CLINIC, UPMC MAGEE HOSPITAL/CLINICS, EMILY REDMAN and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY L. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
EYAJAN v. NESCO RESOURCE LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Defendant:
BILL KAYDO, RANDY EDWARDS, COMMUNITY HEALTH NET and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ACOSTA v. HEART II HEART, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01242
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
HEART II HEART, LLC and TONI CHANDLER DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
CHANDLER v. L'OREAL USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01141
Plaintiff:
KIM E. CHANDLER
Defendant:
L'OREAL USA, INC. and SOFT SHEEN-CARSON LLC
Mediator:
GARY P. CARUSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
COADY et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 3:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
CHANDLER COADY and ADELINE COADY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
