Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Fede v. Redington et al
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
George Fede
Defendant:
Daniel Redington, Chantay Godert, COI Unknown Cecil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Flowers-Bey v. Robert Webster, et al
as 23-1355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shawn Flowers-Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Webster, Thomas Cabrera, Miguel Paniagua and others
Bouton et al v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Steve Bouton and Kimberly Barton
Defendant:
CORIZON LLC, Missouri Department of Corrections, Anne L. Precythe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Godert
as 4:2021cv00630
Petitioner:
Larneal D. Davis
Respondent:
Superintendent Chantay Godert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terry Watson v. Karey Witty, et al
as 21-1963
Defendant / Appellee:
Geeneen Wilhite, MCC Manager of Health Services, George Lombardi, DIRECTOR OF MDOC, Karey L. Witty, Corizon Corrections Health Inc. CEO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terry G. Watson
Fred Silver v. Chantay Godert
as 20-2459
Petitioner / Appellant:
Fred Silver
Respondent / Appellee:
Chantay Godert, Warden, Northeast Correctional Center
Smith v. Stepanek et al
as 5:2020cv06104
Defendant:
Stanley Jansen, Richard Stepanek, Preston Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Godert et al
as 2:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Kalley Campbell, Kim Samang, Sandra Shepard and others
Plaintiff:
James Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers-Bey v. Webster et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Defendant:
Tamaro Crouch, Michael Paniaugua, Dr. Unknown McCollum and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Flowers-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faircloth v. Godert et al
as 4:2019cv02984
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, D. Kuehn, Bill Bowyer and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Faircloth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
