Cases 1 - 10 of 1,138
Hutton v. Blessed Road Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Charles Hutton
Defendant:
Blessed Road Inc and Jennifer Dysart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Barron v. Garr
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Deursla Lashay Barron
Defendant:
Charles Garr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamner v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toston v Parson, et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Charles Toston
Defendant:
Rick Parson and Sharon Castleberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. USA
as 4:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Brandon Charles Martin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
Defendant:
Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Charles Hopkins
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burns v. Calaway et al
as 4:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Brandon Burns
Defendant:
Sean Calaway, Charles Fears and Marty Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sanford v. Eli Hobbs, et al
as 5:2024cv05057
Plaintiff:
Damon Charles Sanford
Defendant:
Eli Hobbs, Brad Robinson, Washington County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swift v. Walmart Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Charles Swift
Defendant:
Walmart, Walmart Corporation and Shanita Greer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
