Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Charles Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-20759
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES DARNELL SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Smith v. Bergami
as 3:2019cv00285
Petitioner:
Charles Kelvin Smith
Respondent:
T Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. JR Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
as 2:2019cv00299
Defendant:
JR Reynolds Tobacco Company, John Bel Edwards, Steve Scailise and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv09441
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Andrew Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davis
as 4:2018cv02813
Petitioner:
Charles Darnell Smith
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Studio Twenty-One Inc et al
as 5:2018mc00028
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Studio Twenty-One Inc, Sonrose Rutledge, Jr, Dorothy Jeanette Oliver Rutledge and others
Smith v. Berryhill
as 6:2018cv00065
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Charles Keyunna Smith
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Smith v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01749
Plaintiff:
Charles D Smith
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
