Cases 1 - 10 of 23
EL et al v. KELSEY et al
as 1:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
NOBLE CHRISTO EL, TRE N VISCO, LEONARD LUDWIGSEN, JR and others
Defendant:
DAVID KELSEY (in his individual and official capacity) doing business as DAVID KELSEY, WARDEN, K. BROWN, "JOHN" CHARLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH
as 2:2021cv05001
In Re:
CHARLES E. SMITH and CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. MOSER et al
as 3:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAUL SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN V. MOSER, BOP DIRECTOR and BOP NER DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH v. MOSER et al
as 3:2021cv00187
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAUL SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN V. MOSER, BOP DIRECTOR and BOP NER DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
as 2:2021cv00439
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Defendant:
DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00076
Defendant:
CARLOS SAUL, MIKE GREENBURG, ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv16803
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2018cv00838
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Clark and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2017cv02339
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 17-2781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DAUPHIN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
